Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Some good news for Indian cricket at last
Monday, June 18, 2007
Woolmer - rest in peace, finally!
Peter Roebuck summarizes the situation best, painting a grim picture of prejudice and rash judgement that possibly rests in all of us. Poor Woolmer was a forward thinker, and genuine contributor to the game of cricket. I hope the ICC recognizes this and institutes a scholarship/award/something to keep him in public memory for all the good things he has done for the game.
Friday, June 15, 2007
Anisuthide yaako indhu
Bahala chennagidhe sir, thumba maja banthu namge nimma hadugalanna keli - innu heege hosa songs create madtha iri - guarantee Kannada industry kooda chennagi mundhe barathe. Kaitha idhivi navella.
Here is the video of the song (click here if you can't watch it):
Here's the MP3.
The lyrics are below:
Anisuthide yaako indu..
Neeneyne nannavalindu
Maayadaa lokadinda Nanagaage bandavalindu
Aahaa yentha madhura yaathane
Kollu hudugi omme nanna, haage summane
Suriyuva soneyu sooside ninnade parimala
Innyara kanasulu neenu hodare talamala
Poorna chandira rajaa haakida..
Ninnaya mogavanu kanda kshanaa…
Naa khaidi neeney seremane
Tabbi nanna appiko omme…. haage summane
Anisuthide yaako indu…
Tutigala hoovali aadada maathina sihiyide
Manasina putadali kevala ninnade sahiyide
Haneyali bareyada ninna hesara
Hrudayadi naane korediruve
Ninagunte idara kalpane
Nanna hesara kooge omme… haage summane
Anisuthide yaako indu….Neeneyney nannavalindu….
Maayadaa lokadinda Nanagaagi bandavalindu
Aahaa yentha madhura yaathaney
Kollu hudugi omme nanna, haage summane…
Thanks very much Shashidhar Desai for all these links.
No one bloody knows!
That is precisely what makes us all so attracted to sport - an underdog can win (India v WI in 1983), a superstar can just as easily fail (Augusta this year - no one expected anyone else but Tiger to win on the last day), strange results do happen (India in Aus in 2003-4, India V Bdesh in WC 2007) - that is why for me sport is the supreme entertainment form, not films, not music, nothing.
You don’t know, I don’t know and, more to the point, experts don’t know either.
No one can ever truly be certain about the immeasurable and indefinable stuff
inside. John McEnroe had a flawed technique and a flawed temperament, but he
wasn’t going to let things like that hold him back. The truth is not in our
backhands, but in our minds.
Read Simon Barnes on precisely this subject. Aah, looking forward to Indianapolis and the US Open this weekend. No one can say for sure who is going to win. I am as good at predicting stuff as the experts in the respective sport.
I feel proud and powerful. I feel on par with everyone else. Cool!
Friday, June 08, 2007
Martin Johnson makes me chuckle
His latest take on the Vaughan 'fredalo' incident - no, I was misquoted, complete misrepresentation of facts etc etc when the damn interview audio was right on the Internet for my granny to download and listen to if she cared - is something else.
If England had collapsed yesterday, as they at one stage threatened to do,
Vaughan could simply have said: "I was totally misquoted by David Gower when I
won the toss. There was one phrase in particular which changed the whole
complexion of what I said.
"The phrase was: 'we'll bat first.' I never used
that phrase. I am not pointing the finger at any one individual. Me and Gower
are good mates, but unfortunately the media have seen fit to blow this whole
toss business out of all proportion."
Or this gem about cricketers' columns in newspapers, ghost written with content fit for ghosts:
However, what really made the hackles rise was the way some of Vaughan's
team-mates, with little or no idea of the facts, used their vacuous newspaper
columns - all of them written under the Geneva Convention directive to reveal
nothing but name, rank and serial number - to instinctively suggest that the
cricketing media had nothing better to do than make up mischievous stories.
Priceless!
Thursday, June 07, 2007
London 2012 logo cockup
Predictably, reactions have been critical. I cannot believe (like many others) that a design firm was paid 400,000 GBP for this logo design. Am I missing something creative- is it really any good? I think not. They apparently had an animated version of the same, which if shown on TV would trigger epileptic fits! And you thought logo designing was a simple affair. Well, it should be - says Seth Godin, in this lucid post.
I find it hard to believe that a committee would actually approve of this. Imagine the sales pitch by the creative brains of the design agency behind this to the London 2012 committee. Words like futuristic, contemporary, zestful, youthful, vibrant etc would have been used many times over in various combinations.
Will be interesting to see what they do with this now. Will they backtrack and discard this - or put their heads in mud and refuse to see reason?