ICC Champions - not so bad after all

The event is proving many sceptics wrong, completely by accident. Bad surfaces usually create interesting matches. Throw in other factors like the dew, and you are bound to get a few upsets, strange matches and unpredictability. We now have a situation where there is every possibility that a major cricket tournament being held on the slow, low pitches of the Indian subcontinent may well have no semi-finalists from Asia. Who would have thought that was possible?

My money was on Sri Lanka going all the way, and there are out of the tournament already. Pakistan are being Pakistan - blowing hot and cold. India struggled to a loss against the Windies yesterday in a bizzare match yesterday, and now have the huge task of defeating Australia to go through.

On most of these pitches, a score of 250 seems to be a high score, and the dew is messing up the captains' minds more than anything else. No one really knows how this tournament will pan out in the end - which suits the ICC well. The pity, of course, is that this came about completely by accident - if the ICC could change anything, they would have asked for pitches where 300 was the minimum the team batting first had to get. So in a strange fashion that is unique to cricket, the tournament is better off because of the lack of quality in the pitches.

Last observation - Manjrekar got it right, cricket in India is no religion. It is Indian cricket that is the opium of the masses. Embarassingly empty stands greet every other match. Blame it on the ticket prices, blame it on saturation-level cricket on TV, blame it on big city distraction - it indeed looks ominous for cricket in general when ODIs in India are played to empty stands. I could actually see many empty seats yesterday when India played WI. Now that was unthinkable! Strongest statement yet by the fans that the administrators better get their house in order - i.e. quality over quantity, better pricing and value for money in the stadium, and most importantly - focus on the cricket, not merely on the finances.